Resource Brief Review Form

 

 

Title:

Author:

Reviewer:

General Review  ___        Technical Review  ___

Date:

 

For the following questions, circle "yes" or "no" and explain:

  1. The manuscript deals with an issue of concern to a large segment of the regulatory community.

 

  1. The manuscript shares information or a practical "know-how" that members of the regulatory community are likely to find helpful.  

 

  1. The manuscript serves to stimulate thinking, discussion, even controversy, within the regulatory community.   

 

  1. The manuscript is written at a level that will be understood by CLEAR members who are not specialists in the subject matter. 

 

  1. The manuscript exhibits logical or clear thinking. 

 

  1. To your knowledge, the manuscript is factually accurate. 

 

Please answer the following completely, attaching additional pages if necessary.

 

___ The manuscript should be considered for publication in its present form with minor edits.

Suggestions for revisions:

 

___ The manuscript should be considered for publication if more major revisions are made.

Suggestions for revisions:

 

___ The manuscript should not be considered for publication as a Resource Brief.

Comments:

 

Indicate the degree to which you feel qualified to comment on this subject matter: