by MELISSA McGINLEY
The first three installments of our telepractice series tracked state and federal telemedicine legislation to help lawmakers identify the complex issues surrounding telepractice-interstate practice (locus of practice), reimbursement, and liability, to name a few. At last count, 17 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, GA, HI, IA, IL, LA, MN, MS, NC, ND, NE, OK, TX) had passed measures on telemedicine in 1997, and more telemedicine legislation is expected in 1998.
In our final column, we'd like to leave you with some questions to ask when deciding how to regulate telepractitioners in your state.
What telepractice
activities are occurring now in your state or province? In other states or
provinces? Who is paying for these actitivities? What federal and military
activities are taking place? Could any of their standards be adapted to a state
or provincial system?
What information is
available on consumer and practitioner satisfaction with telepractice?
What standards need to be
enacted to protect consumers? (e.g., should there be a practitioner at either
end of the transmission?)
Will telepractice
jeopardize secure transmission and storage of medical information in any way?
How will issues of
professional discipline be handled? In which jurisdiction will consumers
initiate complaints against telepractitioners? Where the care is provided or
where the practitioner is located?
How will telepractitioners
be licensed? Will this model adequately protect consumers in your state or
province? Will this model burden practitioners in such a way as to result
ultimately in harm to consumers? Can telepractice be used, or is it being used,
to provide continuing education? Does this method offer advantages to
traditional continuing education?
(These questions are part of an upcoming CLEAR telepractice publication for legislators, to be available in early 1998.)
![]()